The political compass (and why libertarianism is not right-wing)

Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (2):176-186 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The political distinction between left and right remains ideologically muddled. This was not always so, but an immediate return to the pristine usage is impractical. Putting a theory of social liberty to one side, this essay defends the interpretation of left-wing as personal-choice and right-wing as property-choice. This allows an axis that is north/choice (or state-free) and south/control (or state-ruled). This Political Compass clarifies matters without being tendentious or too complicated. It shows that what is called ‘libertarianism’ is north-wing. A quiz gives the reader’s Political Compass reading.

Similar books and articles

Libertarianism.Matt Zwolinski - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.
What is Libertarianism?Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):4.
Society as a department store.Ryszard Legutko - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (3):327-343.
Community in a new libertarianism: Rejoinder to Legutko.Peter Simpson - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):427-429.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
8,549 (#474)

6 months
1,820 (#417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. C. Lester
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.
W. B. Gallie’s “Essentially Contested Concepts”.W. B. Gallie - 1994 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):2-2.

Add more references