The Mnemonic Consequences of Jurors’ Selective Retrieval During Deliberation

Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):627-643 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this empirical paper, Jay, Stone, Meksin, Merck, Gordon and Hirst examine whether jury deliberations, in which individuals collaboratively recall and discuss evidence of a trial, shape the jurors’ memories. In doing so, Jay and colleagues provide a highly ecologically valid baseline for future investigation into why, how and when selective recall either facilitates remembering or leads to forgetting during jury deliberations. In particular, Jay et al. explore the specific social and cognitive mechanisms that might lead to either memory facilitation (RIFA – Retrieval Induced Facilitation) and forgetting (RIF ‐ Retrieval Induced Forgetting) during jury deliberation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,311

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cue-dependent forgetting in paired-associate learning.Tannis Y. Arbuckle - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):124.
Should juries deliberate?Brian R. Hedden - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (4):368-386.
Selective forgetting when the subject is not 'ego-involved.'.F. J. Shaw & A. Spooner - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (3):242.
The mnemonic function of interference.B. Reynolds - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (4):336.
How Forgetting Aids Heuristic Inference.Lael J. Schooler & Ralph Hertwig - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):610-628.
Good Moral Judgment and Decision‐Making Without Deliberation.Asia Ferrin - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):68-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-24

Downloads
18 (#700,686)

6 months
4 (#303,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reviews. [REVIEW]Elmer H. Duncan - 1968 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (3):391-420.

Add more references