Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (3):337-358 (2020)
Abstract |
History at one time drew unproblematically on records produced by human societies about themselves and their doings. Advances in biology and the earth sciences introduced new narrative resources that repositioned the human story in relation to the evolution of all else on the planet, thereby decentering earlier conceptions of time, life, and human agency. This essay reflects on what it means for our understanding of the human that the history of our species has become so intimately entangled with the material processes that make up the biosphere, while concurrently the temporal horizon of our imagination has been stretched forward and back, underscoring the brevity of human existence in relation to earthly time. I suggest that, despite significant changes in the resources with which we can rethink the human condition, drawing upon the sciences, history’s fundamental purposes have not been rendered irrelevant. These center, as before, on the normative project of connecting past and future in ways that make sense of human experience and give meaning to it. In particular, the question of how humans should imagine the stewardship of the Earth in the Anthropocene remains an ethical project for history and not primarily the domain of the natural sciences.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1163/18722636-12341447 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge.Aurea Mota & Gerard Delanty - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):9-38.
The Anthropocene Monument: On Relating Geological and Human Time.Bronislaw Szerszynski - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):111-131.
Not Symbiosis, Not Now: Why Anthropogenic Change Is Not Really Human.Claire Colebrook - 2012 - Oxford Literary Review 34 (2):185-209.
The Question of the Human in the Anthropocene Debate.Daniel Chernilo - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):44-60.
Conceptualizing Human Stewardship in the Anthropocene: The Rights of Nature in Ecuador, New Zealand and India.Stefan Knauß - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (6):703-722.
Human Flourishing and History: A Religious Imaginary for the Anthropocene.Hava Tirosh-Samuelson - 2020 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (3):382-418.
Labor as Action: The Human Condition in the Anthropocene.Ari-Elmeri Hyvönen - 2020 - Research in Phenomenology 50 (2):240-260.
The End of the End of Nature: The Anthropocene and the Fate of the Human.Bronislaw Szerszynski - 2012 - Oxford Literary Review 34 (2):165-184.
Dwelling in the Anthropocene.Cristián Simonetti - 2020 - In Luca Valera & Juan Carlos Castilla (eds.), Global Changes: Ethics, Politics and Environment in the Contemporary Technological World. Springer Verlag. pp. 141-151.
The Bio-Evolutionary Anthropocene Hypothesis: Rethinking the Role of Human-Induced Novel Organisms in Evolution. [REVIEW]Catarina Lira & Pablo Pena Rodrigues - 2019 - Biological Theory 14 (3):141-150.
Rethinking Anthropos in the Anthropocene.Charles Brown - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (1):31-38.
Stuck in the Anthropocene: The Problem of History, Theory, and Practice in Jason W. Moore and John Bellamy Foster’s Eco-Marxism.Alexander M. Stoner & Andony Melathopoulos - 2018 - In Jan Jagodzinski (ed.), Interrogating the Anthropocene: Ecology, Aesthetics, Pedagogy, and the Future in Question. Springer Verlag. pp. 105-132.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-11-27
Total views
18 ( #611,295 of 2,520,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,426 )
2020-11-27
Total views
18 ( #611,295 of 2,520,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,426 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads