The logic of tasks

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 117 (1-3):261-293 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper introduces a semantics for the language of classical first order logic supplemented with the additional operators and . This semantics understands formulas as tasks. An agent , working as a slave for its master , can carry out the task αβ if it can carry out any one of the two tasks α, β, depending on which of them was requested by the master; similarly, it can carry out xα if it can carry out α for any particular value for x selected by the master; an agent can carry out α→β if it can carry out β as long as it has, as a slave , an agent who carries out α; finally, carrying out P, where P is an atomic formula, simply means making P true; in particular, is a task that no agent can carry out. When restricted to the language of classical logic, the meaning of formulas is isomorphic to their classical meaning, which makes our semantics a conservative extension of classical semantics.This semantics can claim to be a formalization of the resource philosophy associated with linear logic, if resources are understood as agents carrying out tasks. The classical operators of our language correspond to the multiplicative operators of linear logic, while and correspond to the additive conjunction and universal quantifier, respectively.Our formalism may also have a potential to be used in AI as an alternative logic of planning and action. Its main appeal is that it is immune to the frame problem and the knowledge preconditions problem.The paper axiomatically defines a logic L in the above language and proves its soundness and completeness with respect to the task semantics in the following intuitive sense: L α iff α can be carried out by an agent who has nothing but its intelligence for carrying out tasks. This logic is shown to be semidecidable in the full language and decidable when the classical quantifier is forbidden in it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Propositional Logic of Elementary Tasks.Giorgi Japaridze - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (2):171-183.
The Logic of Interactive Turing Reduction.Giorgi Japaridze - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):243 - 276.
Introduction to computability logic.Giorgi Japaridze - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (1-3):1-99.
A constructive game semantics for the language of linear logic.Giorgi Japaridze - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 85 (2):87-156.
Differentiating insight from non-insight problems.K. J. Gilhooly & P. Murphy - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (3):279 – 302.
A proof of the impossibility of completing infinitely many tasks.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):1-7.
Tasks, super-tasks, and the modern eleatics.Paul Benacerraf - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (24):765-784.
Introduction to clarithmetic III.Giorgi Japaridze - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):241-252.
Pragmatically before ecologically valid tasks.Laura Macchi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-779.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Introduction to computability logic.Giorgi Japaridze - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (1-3):1-99.
In the Beginning was Game Semantics?Giorgi Japaridze - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 249--350.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A game semantics for linear logic.Andreas Blass - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56 (1-3):183-220.
Dialogspiele als Semantische Grundlage von Logikkalkülen.Kuno Lorenz - 1968 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 11 (1-2):32-55.
Dialogues, strategies, and intuitionistic provability.Walter Felscher - 1985 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 28 (3):217-254.
A syntactic theory of belief and action.Andrew R. Haas - 1986 - Artificial Intelligence 28 (3):245-292.

View all 7 references / Add more references