Leibniz and Arnauld [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):867-868 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central metaphysical question of Leibniz's Discourse on Metaphysics is how to distinguish the actions of God from those of his creatures. In his letter to Arnauld of April 30, 1687, Leibniz wrote that as long as one does not have the knowledge of what a substance is "one will have nothing on which to settle... a solid principle." Thus it seems that the answer to the question of substance is at the same time the solution to the problem of metaphysics. Alas the problem begins where the solution lies. There are four different theories of substance in Leibniz's writings, so the question arises as to which of them provides the answer to Leibnizian metaphysics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essence and Possibility in the Leibniz‐Arnauld Correspondence.Eric Stencil - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):2-26.
Leibniz and Arnauld. [REVIEW]Richard A. Watson - 1991 - International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):148-149.
Leibniz and Arnauld. [REVIEW]Catherine Wilson - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):661-674.
The Leibniz-Arnauld correspondence.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Antoine Arnauld & Haydn Trevor Mason - 1967 - New York,: Barnes & Noble. Edited by Antoine Arnauld & Haydn Trevor Mason.
Occasionalism in the Malebranche-Arnauld Debate.Andrew Gerard Black - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references