Frege, contextuality and compositionality

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):115-136 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two principles which bear the name Frege''sprinciple: the principle of compositionality, and the contextprinciple. The aim of this contribution is to investigate whether thisis justified: did Frege accept both principles at the same time, did hehold the one principle but not the other, or did he, at some moment,change his opinion? The conclusion is as follows. There is a developmentin Frege''s position. In the period of Grundlagen he followed to a strict form of contextuality. He repeatedcontextuality in later writings, but became less strict. From 1914 on,pushed by the needs of research, he comes close to compositionality. Buthe could never make the final step toward compositionality forprincipled reasons, therefore he always would reject compositionality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,191

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Compositionality: Its Historic Context.Theo M. V. Janssen - 2012 - In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery, The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press. pp. 19-46.
Words in contexts: Fregean elucidations.Hans Rott - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (6):621-643.
Did Frege believe Frege's principle?Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):87-114.
Compositionality and Structured Propositions.Lorraine Juliano Keller & John A. Keller - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):313-323.
Compositionality and Contextuality as Adjoint Principles.Oleg Prosorov - 2005 - In Markus Werning, Edouard Machery & Gerhard Schurz, Applications to Linguistics, Psychology and Neuroscience. De Gruyter. pp. 149-176.
Frege, hilbert, and the conceptual structure of model theory.William Demopoulos - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):211-225.
Compositionality is not the problem.Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:7.
Communication and strong compositionality.Peter Pagin - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):287-322.
Compositionality and Understanding.Fei YuGuo - 2014 - ProtoSociology 31:50-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
219 (#125,443)

6 months
17 (#208,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2014 - London and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-seven Iterated Theory Change Operators.Hans Rott - 2009 - In Jacek Malinowski David Makinson & Wansing Heinrich, Towards Mathematical Philosophy. Springer. pp. 269–296.
Against Fregean Quantification.Bryan Pickel & Brian Rabern - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9 (37):971-1007.
Compositionality.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
The foundations of arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1884/1950 - Evanston, Ill.,: Northwestern University Press.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
The Interpretation of Fregeʼs Philosophy.Michael Dummett - 1980 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references