Ethics of early detection of disease risk factors: A scoping review

BMC Medical Ethics 25 (1):1-16 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background Scientific and technological advancements in mapping and understanding the interrelated pathways through which biological and environmental exposures affect disease development create new possibilities for detecting disease risk factors. Early detection of such risk factors may help prevent disease onset or moderate the disease course, thereby decreasing associated disease burden, morbidity, and mortality. However, the ethical implications of screening for disease risk factors are unclear and the current literature provides a fragmented and case-by-case picture. Methods To identify key ethical considerations arising from the early detection of disease risk factors, we performed a systematic scoping review. The Scopus, Embase, and Philosopher’s Index databases were searched for peer-reviewed, academic records, which were included if they were written in English or Dutch and concerned the ethics of (1) early detection of (2) disease risk factors for (3) disease caused by environmental factors or gene-environment interactions. All records were reviewed independently by at least two researchers. Results After screening 2034 titles and abstracts, and 112 full papers, 55 articles were included in the thematic synthesis of the results. We identified eight common ethical themes: (1) Reliability and uncertainty in early detection, (2) autonomy, (3) privacy, (4) beneficence and non-maleficence, (5) downstream burdens on others, (6) responsibility, (7) justice, and (8) medicalization and conceptual disruption. We identified several gaps in the literature, including a relative scarcity of research on ethical considerations associated with environmental preventive health interventions, a dearth of practical suggestions on how to address expressed concerns about overestimating health capacities, and a lack of insights into preventing undue attribution of health responsibility to individuals. Conclusions The ethical concerns arising with the early detection of risk factors are often interrelated and complex. Comprehensive ethical analyses are needed that are better embedded in normative frameworks and also assess and weigh the expected benefits of early risk factor detection. Such research is necessary for developing and implementing responsible and fair preventive health policies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,319

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From risk factors to health resources in medical practice.Hanne Hollnagel - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):255-262.
The burden of dementia: A medical and research perspective.Piero Antuono & Jan Beyer - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):3-13.
Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?P. Skrabanek - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):187-190.
Temporal uncertainty in disease diagnosis.Bjørn Hofmann - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (3):401-411.
Neuroethical Issues In Early Detection Of Alzheimer's Disease.Guy M. Mckhann & Marilyn S. Albert - 2011 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-05

Downloads
35 (#509,790)

6 months
22 (#168,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcel Verweij
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations