Journal of Global Ethics 18 (2):267-285 (2022)
AbstractDo past state actions, such as the American conquest of northern Mexico, the British colonization of South Asia, and the Spanish expulsion of the Sephardim and Moriscos, grant contemporary Mexicans, South Asians, and the descendants of the Sephardim and Moriscos a particular right to immigrate to the United States, the United Kingdom, and Spain respectively? In this paper I examine three theoretical models for addressing this question: retrospective responsibility for historic injustice; the principle of coercively constituted identities; and the theory of remedial responsibility. I argue that remedial responsibility best justifies a particular right to immigrate through responsibility for the past for three reasons. First, it relieves us of the epistemological task of establishing causal responsibility. Second, it lessens the normative task of identifying a theory of unjust harm to establish moral responsibility. Finally, it facilitates the normative task of ranking the claims to immigrate of different individuals.
Similar books and articles
Can the Right to Internal Movement, Residence, and Employment Ground a Right to Immigrate?Michael Rabinder James - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (2):1-18.
Historicism, Non-Historicism, or a Mix?Ishtiyaque Haji - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (3):185-204.
Magical Agents, Global Induction, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate.Ishtiyaque Haji & Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):343 – 371.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Personal Identity and Responsibility for Past Actions.Marc Slors - 2000 - In A. van den Beld (ed.), Moral Responsibility and Ontology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 63--76.
Immigration as a Human Right.Kieran Oberman - 2016 - In Sarah Fine & Lea Ypi (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 32-56.
The Past, History, and Corporate Social Responsibility.Robert Phillips, Judith Schrempf-Stirling & Christian Stutz - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 166 (2):203-213.
‘A Fine Risk to Be Run’: Améry and Levinas on Aging, Responsibility, and Risk in the Wake of Atrocity.Jill Stauffer - 2016 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 24 (3):38-55.
The Forgiveness of Time and Consciousness.Nicolas de Warren - 2012 - In Dan Zahavi (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.
Individual and Collective Responsibility.Andrew C. Khoury - 2017 - In Zachary J. Goldberg (ed.), Reflections on Ethics and Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Peter A. French. Springer. pp. 1-20.
Review Essay: Alexander Brown's Theory of Personal Responsibility.Marion Smiley - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
There Is No Moral Right to Immigrate to the United States.Stephen Kershnar - 2000 - Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (2):141-158.
La responsabilidad de la gente corriente en la Justicia Global y la pobreza en el mundo.Francisco Javier Espinosa Antón - 2020 - Isegoría 63:647-666.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration.David Miller - 2016 - Harvard University Press.
Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.Will Kymlicka - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):250-253.
Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh.David Miller - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (1):111-120.
A Lockean Argument for Black Reparations.Bernard R. Boxill - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):63-91.