Reply to critics

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):286-304 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discussion responds to important questions raised about my theory of fairness in the global economy by Christian Barry, Charles Beitz, A.J. Julius and Kristi Olson. I further elaborate how moral argument can be ‘internal’ to a social practice, how my proposed principles of fairness depend on international practice, how I can admit several relevant conceptions of ‘harm’ and why my account does not depend on a problematic conception of societal ‘endowments’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The meaning of “asshole”.Aaron James - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 62 (62):51-57.
What’s a Religion and Who’s a Sect?Aaron James - 2004 - Teaching Ethics 4 (2):103-106.
Equality in a Realistic Utopia.Aaron James - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):699-724.
Rights and circularity in scanlon’s contractualism.Aaron James - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):367-374.
Power in social organization as the subject of justice.Aaron James - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):25–49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-09

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron James
University of California, Irvine

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references