Money, recognition, and the outer limits of obliviousness

Synthese 202 (2):1-24 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does the very existence of money depend in any sense on our “recognition” of it? According to certain functionalist views, no such attitudes are necessary. This paper argues to the contrary for recognition dependence, of a minimal sort. What’s needed in a population is (1) the functional know-how of money use, (2) an ideational structure founded upon people’s thinking about what others are thinking, and (3) wide enough acceptance of a payment or settlement obligation (as expressed, e.g., when someone asks a vendor “So what do I owe ya?”).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,235

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-28

Downloads
23 (#790,263)

6 months
10 (#593,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron James
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1963 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Morals by agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 20 references / Add more references