Buddhism and the Ethics of Species Conservation

Environmental Values 15 (1):85 - 97 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Efforts to conserve endangered species of animal are, in some important respects, at odds with Buddhist ethics. On the one hand, being abstract entities, species cannot suffer, and so cannot be proper objects of compassion or similar moral virtues. On the other, Buddhist commitments to equanimity tend to militate against the idea that the individual members of endangered species have greater value than those of less-threatened ones. This paper suggests that the contribution of Buddhism to the issue of species conservation should not, however, be discounted. It argues, on the contrary, that Buddhist traditions, in reminding us of the moral significance of the suffering of individual animals, add an important dimension to debates concerning the ethical justification of efforts to conserve endangered species

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why do species matter?Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112.
Triage as a species preservation strategy.David H. Bennett - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (1):47-58.
On the Origin of Species Notions and Their Ethical Limitations.Mark Greene - 2011 - In Beauchamp Tom & R. G. Frey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics,. Oxford University Press. pp. 577-602.
Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism.Ingo Brigandt - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1305-1316.
Value and population size.Thomas Hurka - 1982 - Ethics 93 (3):496-507.
Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory.James C. Anderson - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):347 - 365.
Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species.Rick O’Neil - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem.Bradley E. Wilson - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):339-356.
Cento e quarenta anons sem Charles Darwin bastam: sobre variedades, espécies, e definições.Ricardo Wainzbort - 2000 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 4 (1):141-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
60 (#262,991)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Paul James
Durham University

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics.Peter Harvey - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (295):168-171.
Biodiversity.Holmes Rolston - 2001 - In Dale Jamieson (ed.), A Companion to Environmental Philosophy. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell. pp. 402–415.

View all 6 references / Add more references