The weak square property

Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):640-657 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We formulate and prove a combinatorial property assuming AD + V = L(R). As a consequence, we show that every regular κ which is either a Suslin cardinal or the successor of a Suslin cardinal is δ 2 1 -supercompact. In particular, all the projective ordinals δ 1 n are δ 2 1 -supercompact

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Diamond, square, and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (3):387-395.
Indestructibility, HOD, and the Ground Axiom.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):261-265.
The independence of.Amir Leshem & Menachem Magidor - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):350-362.
A note on tall cardinals and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (1-2):128-132.
Two weak consequences of 0#. [REVIEW]M. Gitik, M. Magidor & H. Woodin - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):597 - 603.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#450,372)

6 months
2 (#1,349,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Four and more.Ilijas Farah & Jindřich Zapletal - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 140 (1):3-39.
An inner model theoretic proof of Becker’s theorem.Grigor Sargsyan - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):999-1003.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the determinacy of games on ordinals.L. A. Harrington - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 20 (2):109.

Add more references