Argumentation 14 (3):261-286 (2000)

Normative pragmatics can bridge the differences between dialectical and rhetorical theories in a way that saves the central insights of both. Normative pragmatics calls attention to how the manifest strategic design of a message produces interpretive effects and interactional consequences. Argumentative analysis of messages should begin with the manifest persuasive rationale they communicate. But not all persuasive inducements should be treated as arguments. Arguments express with a special pragmatic force propositions where those propositions stand in particular inferential relations to one another. Normative pragmatics provides a framework within which varieties of propositional inference and pragmatic force may be kept straight. Normative pragmatics conceptualizes argumentative effectiveness in a way that integrates notions of rhetorical strategy and rhetorical situation with dialectical norms and procedures for reasonable deliberation. Strategic effectiveness should be seen in terms of maximizing the chances that claims and arguments will be reasonably evaluated, whether or not they are accepted. Procedural rationality should be seen in terms of adjustment to the demands of concrete circumstances. Two types of adjustment are illustrated: rhetorical strategies for framing the conditions for dialectical deliberation and rhetorical strategies for making do with limitations to dialectical deliberation
Keywords argumentation  dialectic  discourse analysis  fallacy  rhetoric
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1007853013191
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.H. P. Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
A Rhetoric of Motives.Kenneth Burke - 1950 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
The Realm of Rhetoric.Ch Perelman & William Kluback - 1982 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (4):240-242.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pragmatics.Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) - 2007 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Pragmatic Circle.Kepa Korta & John Perry - 2008 - Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357.
Schemata and Associative Processes in Pragmatics.Marco Mazzone - 2011 - Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8):2148-2159.
On Phrasal Pragmatics and What is Descriptively Referred To.Esther Romero & Belén Soria - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):63-84.


Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #138,527 of 2,507,093 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,093 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes