On the Foundations of Nash Equilibrium: Hans Jørgen Jacobsen

Economics and Philosophy 12 (1):67-88 (1996)

Abstract

The most important analytical tool in non-cooperative game theory is the concept of a Nash equilibrium, which is a collection of possibly mixed strategies, one for each player, with the property that each player's strategy is a best reply to the strategies of the other players. If we do not go into normative game theory, which concerns itself with the recommendation of strategies, and focus instead entirely on the positive theory of prediction, two alternative interpretations of the Nash equilibrium concept are predominantly available.In the more traditional one, a Nash equilibrium is a prediction of actual play. A game may not have a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies, and a mixed strategy equilibrium may be difficult to incorporate into this interpretation if it involves the idea of actual randomization over equally good pure strategies. In another interpretation originating from Harsanyi, see also Rubinstein, and Aumann and Brandenburger, a Nash equilibrium is a ‘consistent’ collection of probabilistic expectations, conjectures, on the players. It is consistent in the sense that for each player each pure strategy, which has positive probability according to the conjecture about that player, is indeed a best reply to the conjectures about others.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
38 (#303,418)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is Rational About Nash Equilibria?Mathias Risse - 2000 - Synthese 124 (3):361 - 384.
On the Principle of Coordination.Maarten C. W. Janssen - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (2):221-234.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Relevance of Nash Equilibrium to Psychiatric Disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.
Maximin Play in Completely Mixed Strategic Games.Vitaly Pruzhansky - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (4):543-561.
Correlated-Belief Equilibrium.Elias Tsakas - 2016 - Synthese 193 (3):757-779.
On Stackelberg Mixed Strategies.Vincent Conitzer - 2016 - Synthese 193 (3):689-703.
The Hypothesis of Nash Equilibrium and Its Bayesian Justification.Paul Weirich - 1994 - In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 245--264.
What Is Rational About Nash Equilibria?Mathias Risse - 2000 - Synthese 124 (3):361-384.
Divide-the-Dollar Game Revisited.Nejat Anbarci - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):295-303.