Hume Studies 46 (1):3-31 (2022)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The common view that Hume is a regularity theorist about laws of nature isn’t textually well grounded. The texts show that he thinks of them as objective governing principles that could conceivably be violated while still counting as a law of nature. This is a standard view at the time, and Hume borrows it from others. He implies that the best evidence for rational religion is the exceptionless workings of the laws of nature, he argues that suicide isn’t incompatible with the will of God by identifying his will with the laws of nature, and he has Philo argue for the existence of God from the simplicity of the laws governing the world. He sheds some of the theological baggage that laws of nature carry at the time, but not all of it.
|
Keywords | Hume Laws of Nature |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2020, 2022 |
DOI | 10.1353/hms.2020.0000 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analytical Examination of Hume’s Standpoint About the Laws of Nature.Majid Givi - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 8 (31-32):278-293.
Hume on Laws and Miracles.Nathan Rockwood - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4).
Prawa natury, prawa nauki a cuda. Krytyka argumentów Hume'a przeciwko cudom.Andrzej Stępnik - 2007 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
Is It Time for a Nietzschean Genealogy of Laws of Nature?: Walter Ott, Lydia Patton : Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, X+264pp, $65 HB. [REVIEW]Jason Winning - 2019 - Metascience 28 (2):269-271.
What Would Hume Say? Regularities, Laws, and Mechanisms.Holly Andersen - 2017 - In Phyllis Ilari & Stuart Glennan (eds.), Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanistic Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 157-168.
Against Miracles as Law-Violations: A Neo-Aristotelian Approach.Archer Joel - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):83--98.
The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
On Natural Selection and Hume's Second Problem.Armando Aranda-Anzaldo - 1998 - Evolution and Cognition 4 (2):156-172.
David Hume's Legal Theory: The Significance of General Laws.Neil McArthur - 2004 - History of European Ideas 30 (2):149-166.
Hume on Miracles: Begging-the-Question Against Believers.Benjamin F. Armstrong - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3):319 - 328.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Nailed to Hume's Cross?John Carroll - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 67--81.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-06-30
Total views
302 ( #34,311 of 2,498,211 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #15,881 of 2,498,211 )
2019-06-30
Total views
302 ( #34,311 of 2,498,211 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #15,881 of 2,498,211 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads