Hume Studies 46 (1):3-31 (2022)

Authors
Michael Jacovides
Purdue University
Abstract
The common view that Hume is a regularity theorist about laws of nature isn’t textually well grounded. The texts show that he thinks of them as objective governing principles that could conceivably be violated while still counting as a law of nature. This is a standard view at the time, and Hume borrows it from others. He implies that the best evidence for rational religion is the exceptionless workings of the laws of nature, he argues that suicide isn’t incompatible with the will of God by identifying his will with the laws of nature, and he has Philo argue for the existence of God from the simplicity of the laws governing the world. He sheds some of the theological baggage that laws of nature carry at the time, but not all of it.
Keywords Hume  Laws of Nature
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020, 2022
DOI 10.1353/hms.2020.0000
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytical Examination of Hume’s Standpoint About the Laws of Nature.Majid Givi - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 8 (31-32):278-293.
Hume on Laws and Miracles.Nathan Rockwood - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4).
A Defense of Hume on Miracles.Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
Against Miracles as Law-Violations: A Neo-Aristotelian Approach.Archer Joel - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):83--98.
The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
On Natural Selection and Hume's Second Problem.Armando Aranda-Anzaldo - 1998 - Evolution and Cognition 4 (2):156-172.
Laws of Nature.Norman Swartz - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
David Hume's Legal Theory: The Significance of General Laws.Neil McArthur - 2004 - History of European Ideas 30 (2):149-166.
Hume on Miracles: Begging-the-Question Against Believers.Benjamin F. Armstrong - 1992 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3):319 - 328.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Nailed to Hume's Cross?John Carroll - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 67--81.
Hume and Miracles.Matthew C. Bagger - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-30

Total views
302 ( #34,311 of 2,498,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #15,881 of 2,498,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes