Every Vote Counts: Equality, Autonomy, and the Moral Value of Democratic Decision-Making

Res Publica 21 (1):61-75 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the moral value of formal democratic decision-making? Egalitarian accounts of democracy provide a powerful answer to this question. They present formal democratic procedures as a way for a society of equals to arrive at collective decisions in a transparent and mutually acceptable manner. More specifically, such procedures ensure and publicly affirm that all members of a political community, in their capacity as autonomous actors, are treated as equals who are able and have a right to participate in collective decision-making. Recently, a number of authors have raised what I describe as the ‘no impact’ objection. This objection focuses on the egalitarian emphasis on autonomy to cast doubt on the moral value of formal democratic procedures. It holds that individual participation in formal democratic decision-making has no impact on the eventual result, and therefore cannot be understood as an exercise in autonomy. Consequently, the ‘no impact’ objection claims that the moral value of formal democracy cannot be explained with reference to an egalitarian ideal of ‘rule by the people’. In this article, I refute this objection by complementing an egalitarian account of democracy with an account of basic autonomy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representative Democracy and the Public Trust.Evelyn Keyes - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):29-35.
Voting in Bad Faith.Joanne C. Lau - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (3):281-294.
Shared decision-making and patient autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Apathy: the democratic disease.Jeffrey E. Green - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):745-768.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-08

Downloads
118 (#148,158)

6 months
15 (#159,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Jacob
Freie Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

Enfranchising the Youth.Lachlan Montgomery Umbers - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (6):732-755.
Enfranchising the Youth.Lachlan Montgomery Umbers - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (6):1-24.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Justice for hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references