Medico-legal and ethical aspects of nasal fractures secondary to assault: do we owe a duty of care to advise patients to have a facial x-ray?: Table 1

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):125-126 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Guidelines advise that x-rays do not contribute to the clinical management of simple nasal fractures. However, in cases of simple nasal fracture secondary to assault, a facial x-ray may provide additional legal evidence should the victim wish to press charges, though there is no published guidance. We examine the ethical and medico-legal issues surrounding this controversial area

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patients' duties.Michael J. Meyer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
The patient's duty to adhere to prescribed treatment: An ethical analysis.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188.
Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
Do doctors owe a special duty of beneficence to their patients?R. Gillon - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):171-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-22

Downloads
41 (#380,229)

6 months
23 (#116,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references