Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1):153-155 (1997)

Herbert Davidson's critique of my thesis regarding the relation between Averroes' Middle and Long commentaries on De anima contrasts my reading and translation of Middle Commentary passages with his own. I leave it to the informed reader to judge whether one translation is more “neutral” than the other, excluding the specific denotation which I give to sharh, which is the point at issue.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0957423900002307
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Response.Alfred L. Ivry - 1997 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1):153.
Middle Commentary on Aristotle's de Anima.Alfred L. Ivry (ed.) - 2001 - Brigham Young University.
Averroes on Intellection and Conjunction.Alfred L. Ivry - 1966 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 86 (2):76-85.
Averroes and the Metaphysics of Causation.Alfred L. Ivry & Barry S. Kogan - 1987 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 107 (3):527.
Averroes' De Substantia.Alfred L. Ivry - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 41 (4):816-818.
The Exalted Faith. [REVIEW]Alfred Ivry - 1989 - Speculum 64 (3):721-722.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #987,878 of 2,461,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,755 of 2,461,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes