Journal of Semantics 37 (3):425-454 (2020)
AbstractFollowing a recent discussion in Fox & Spector 2018, this paper provides an argument for a particular view of the theory of scalar implicatures and exhaustification where exhaustification is only allowed if it alters the overall sentence meaning without weakening it. I show that this idea is helpful to make sense of the so-called dependent plural interpretations, addressed within the theory of scalar implicatures in Zweig 2009. Even though Zweig’s account is based on insightful and plausible assumptions, it ultimately fails to derive dependent plural readings. The main reason for this is the use of the Strongest Candidate Principle of Chierchia 2006 that happens to filter out the needed interpretation. Replacing the Strongest Candidate Principle with a weaker constraint on exhaustification along the lines of Fox & Spector 2018 resolves the issue, while keeping most of Zweig’s insights intact.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures.E. Chemla & B. Spector - 2011 - Journal of Semantics 28 (3):359-400.
Economy and Embedded Exhaustification.Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector - 2018 - Natural Language Semantics 26 (1):1-50.
Presupposed Ignorance and Exhaustification: How Scalar Implicatures and Presuppositions Interact.Benjamin Spector & Yasutada Sudo - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (5):473-517.
Some Remarks on the Scalar Implicatures Debate.Salvatore Pistoia-Reda - 2014 - In Pragmatics, Semantics and the Case of Scalar Implicatures. Palgrave. pp. 1-12.
Against Chierchia's Computational Account of Scalar Implicatures.Owen Greenhall - 2008 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):373-384.
Scalar Implicatures and Iterated Admissibility.Sascia Pavan - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (4):261-290.
Against Grammatical Computation of Scalar Implicatures.B. Russell - 2006 - Journal of Semantics 23 (4):361-382.
Scalar Implicatures of Embedded Disjunction.Luka Crnič, Emmanuel Chemla & Danny Fox - 2015 - Natural Language Semantics 23 (4):271-305.
Pragmatics, Semantics and the Case of Scalar Implicatures.Salvatore Pistoia Reda (ed.) - 2014 - Palgrave.
Indefinites, Dependent Plurality, and the Viability Requirement on Scalar Alternatives.L. Alonso-Ovalle & P. Menendez-Benito - 2013 - Journal of Semantics 30 (1):65-102.
A Cognitive-Pragmatic Study of Non-Scalar Implicatures.Yanfei Zhang & Shaojie Zhang - 2020 - Pragmatics and Society 11 (1):149-163.
Readings of scalar particles: noch / still.Sigrid Beck - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (1):1-67.
Disjunction Triggers Exhaustivity Implicatures in 4- to 5-Year-Olds: Investigating the Role of Access to Alternatives.Nicole Gotzner, David Barner & Stephen Crain - 2020 - Journal of Semantics 37 (2):219-245.
A Scalar Implicature-Based Approach to Neg-Raising.Jacopo Romoli - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (4):291-353.
References found in this work
Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge Between Aspect and Measurement.Lucas Champollion - 2017 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach.Godehard Link - 1983 - In P. Portner & B. H. Partee (eds.), Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 127--147.
Citations of this work
Dependent plurals and three levels of multiplicity.Serge Minor - 2022 - Linguistics and Philosophy 45 (3):431-509.