Physica ingeniosa and Abyssinian philosophy: the Ambivalence of the Cartesian Physics in De ratione, V

Laboratorio dell’ISPF 13 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study contrasts Vico’s conception of the physics based on ingenium, developed in chapter five of De ratione, to its alleged counterpart, Cartesian deductive natural science. By examining the various «faces» and ramifications of Cartesian physics with a special focus on Thomas Burnet’s «ingenious physics», the Authors demonstrate the affinity of some versions of the Cartesian hypothetical approach to Vico’s rhetorical epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion.Edward Slowik - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.
Cartesian Psychology of Antoine Le Grand.Gary Hatfield - 2014 - In Mihnea Dobre & Tammy Nyden (eds.), Cartesian Empiricisms. Springer. pp. 251-274.
Complexity, meaning and the cartesian cut.Harald Atmanspacher - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):168-181.
Descartes and Circular Inertia.Edward Slowik - 1999 - Modern Schoolman 77 (1):1-11.
Hylomorphism and Post-Cartesian Philosophy of Mind.William Jaworski - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:209-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
3 (#1,657,732)

6 months
1 (#1,478,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references