Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
AbstractInterpersonal contexts can be complex because they can involve two or more people who are interdependent, each of whom is pursuing both individual and shared goals. Interactions consist of individual and joint behaviors that evolve dynamically over time. Interactions are likely to affect people’s attitudes because the interpersonal context gives conversation partners a great deal of opportunity to intentionally or unintentionally influence each other. However, despite the importance of attitudes and attitude change in interpersonal interactions, this topic remains understudied. To shed light on the importance of this topic. We briefly review the features of interpersonal contexts and build a case that understanding people’s sense of psychological safety is key to understanding interpersonal influences on people’s attitudes. Specifically, feeling psychologically safe can make individuals more open-minded, increase reflective introspection, and decrease defensive processing. Psychological safety impacts how individuals think, make sense of their social world, and process attitude-relevant information. These processes can result in attitude change, even without any attempt at persuasion. We review the literature on interpersonal threats, receiving psychological safety, providing psychological safety, and interpersonal dynamics. We then detail the shortcomings of current approaches, highlight unanswered questions, and suggest avenues for future research that can contribute in developing this field.
Similar books and articles
A model of dual attitudes.Timothy D. Wilson, Samuel Lindsey & Tonya Y. Schooler - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (1):101-126.
Attitudes to Nuclear Defence: An Investigation of Processes of Change in Elite and Non-Elite Belief Systems.Louise Coward - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Bradford (United Kingdom)
Healthcare Professionals Experience of Psychological Safety, Voice, and Silence.Róisín O'Donovan, Aoife De Brún & Eilish McAuliffe - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Bertram Gawronski & Galen V. Bodenhausen - 2006 - Psychological Bulletin 132 (5):692-731.
Testing the Self-Perception Explanation of Dissonance Phenomena: On the Salience of Premanipulation Attitudes.Daryl J. Bem & H. Keith - 1970 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14 (1):23-31.
Incompatibilism and personal relationships: another look at strawson's objective attitude.Seth Shabo - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):131 - 147.
Racial Attitudes, Accumulation Mechanisms, and Disparities.Ron Mallon - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (4):953-975.
Social media, interpersonal relations and the objective attitude.Michael-John Turp - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (3):269-279.
Should doctors ever be professionally required to change their attitudes?Demian Whiting - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (2):67-73.
Is natural attitude still an attitude? (The problematics of natural attitude in Husserl's works on reduction).J. Kunschova - 2005 - Filozofia 60 (3):155-161.
Psychological Processes Underlying Persuasion.Richard E. Petty & Pablo Briñol - 2008 - Diogenes 55 (1):52-67.
Interreligious education in the context of Social Psychology research on attitudes and prejudice.Martin Rothgangel - 2016 - HTS Theological Studies 72 (4):1-9.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorizing with a cross-cultural perspective.Hila Riemer, Sharon Shavitt, Minkyung Koo & Hazel Rose Markus - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (4):619-648.
The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.Vincent Pillaud, Nicoletta Cavazza & Fabrizio Butera - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.