On the Contribution of Volterra and Lotka to the Development of Modern Biomathematics

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 10 (1):37 - 49 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The birth of modern biomathematics took place in the 1920s and was characterized by two significant new facts: the systematic use of mathematics in biology not as a technical aid but as a conceptual tool, and the attempt to apply a determinist or a mechanist conception to biology. In this paper we deal with the developments of population dynamics and with the main contributions to this trend, i.e. the works of Vito Volterra and Alfred J. Lotka. The purpose is to show that these contributions are representative — in different and sometimes contrasting ways — of the new developments of biomathematics. The analysis of the priority question concerning the discovery of the 'Volterra-Lotka' equations and the analysis of the Volterra-Lotka correspondence show that Volterra's approach was strictly adherent to the classical physico-mathematical paradigm, while Lotka's point of view was more eclectic and open-minded as regards the new developments of physics, and somewhat skeptical about formal statements. We could say that while Volterra followed the 'mechanical analogy' Lotka had an inclination for the 'thermodynamic analogy' and had a great interest for the energetic problems in population dynamics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modeling causal structures: Volterra’s struggle and Darwin’s success.Raphael Scholl & Tim Räz - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (1):115-132.
Transfer and templates in scientific modelling.Wybo Houkes & Sjoerd D. Zwart - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 77:93-100.
Chaos in game dynamics.Brian Skyrms - 1992 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (2):111-130.
Models in Science (2nd edition).Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Robust Volterra Principle.Michael Weisberg & Kenneth Reisman - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (1):106-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references