Experimental extinction as a function of number of reinforcements

Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):314 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0042858

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resistance to extinction as a function of the number of reinforcements.S. B. Williams - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (5):506.
Sequence, number of nonrewards, anticipation, and intertrial interval in extinction.E. J. Capaldi & Kenneth Kassover - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):470.
Effect of N-length, number of different N-lengths, and number of reinforcements on resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):230.
Experimental extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials and response strength.John H. Rohrer - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (6):473.
Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval.Solomon Weinstock - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):151.
Influence of intertrial interval during extinction on spontaneous recovery of conditioned eyelid responses.M. Gordon Howat & David A. Grant - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):11.
Supplementary report: Influence of intertrial interval during extinction on spontaneous recovery of conditioned eyelid responses.Ellen Y. Beeman, Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):279.
Reaction latency (StR) as a function of the number of reinforcements (N).John M. Felsinger, Arthur I. Gladstone, Harry G. Yamaguchi & Clark L. Hull - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (3):214.
Latent extinction as a function of number and duration of pre-extinction exposures.James A. Dyal - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (1):98.
Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials.Walter C. Stanley - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):249.
Effect of intertrial interval on acquisition and extinction of a running response.John W. Cotton & Donald J. Lewis - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (1):15.
Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval.C. Thomas Surridge & Abram Amsel - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):361.
Experimental extinction as a function of the intertrial intervals during conditioning and extinction.Warren H. Teichner - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (3):170.
Response latency at zero drive after varying numbers of reinforcements.David Zeaman & Betty J. House - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):570.
A comparison of two methods of producing experimental extinction.Gregory A. Kimble & John W. Kendall Jr - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (2):87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references