Differential Resistance to Extinction Determined by a Small Number of Differential Instrumental Conditioning Trials

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):350 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0021292

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Induction in differential instrumental conditioning.James R. Ison & Richard V. Krane - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):183.
Transfer of training from differential classical to differential instrumental conditioning.Milton A. Trapold, George W. Lawton & Robert A. Dick - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):568.
Varied functions of punishment in differential instrumental conditioning.George T. Taylor - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):298.
Differential conditioning extinction, and secondary reinforcement.Roger W. Black - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):67.
"Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".Robert A. Fleming, Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):295.
The effect of differential extinction on spontaneous recovery.Alvin M. Liberman - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):722.
Successive nonreinforcements (N-length) and resistance to extinction at spaced trials.Jared B. Jobe & Roger L. Mellgren - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):652.
A small-trials PREE with adult humans: Resistance to extinction as a function of number of N-R transitions.Leonard Poon & Joseph Halpern - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):124.
Differential instrumental conditioning as a function of percentage and amount of positive stimulus reward.James H. McHose & Douglas P. Peters - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):413.
Resistance to extinction as a function of number of nonreinforced trials and effortfulness of response.A. Grant Young - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):610.
Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
Resistance to extinction in GSR conditioning following different numbers of postpeak acquisition trials.C. F. Schramm & H. D. Kimmel - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):239.
A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Gordon H. Bower - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):196.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials.Virginia Fairfax Sheffeld - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (3):305.
Differential conditioning and intensity of the UCS.W. N. Runquist, K. W. Spence & D. W. Stubbs - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (1):51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references