Reassessing the Purpose of Punishment: The Roles of Mercy and Victim-involvement in Criminal Proceedings
Criminal Justice Ethics 33 (1):40-57 (2014)
AbstractThis article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Limits of Criminal Disenfranchisement.Nicholas Munn - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):223-239.
Punishing the Innocent: Children of Incarcerated and Detained Parents.Manning Rita - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):267-287.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Victim and Society: Sharing Wrongs, but in Which Roles? [REVIEW]Claes Lernestedt - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):187-203.
Criminal Law, the Victim and Community: The Shades of 'We' and the Conceptual Involvement of Community in Contemporary Criminal Law Theory. [REVIEW]Nina Peršak - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):205-215.
Punishing Cruelly: Punishment, Cruelty, and Mercy.Paulo D. Barrozo - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):67-84.
Compulsory Victim Restitution is Punishment: A Reply to Boonin.Michael Cholbi - 2010 - Public Reason 2 (1):85-93.
The Story of Justice: Retribution, Mercy, and the Role of Emotions in the Capital Sentencing Process. [REVIEW]Mary Sigler - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (3):339-367.
Mercy, Retributivism, and Harsh Punishment.Stephen Kershnar - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):209-224.
A Political Theory of Blackmail: A Reply to Professor Dripps. [REVIEW]Russell L. Christopher - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):261-269.
The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law.John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.