Comparative legal study on privacy and personal data protection for robots equipped with artificial intelligence: looking at functional and technological aspects

AI and Society 34 (3):509-533 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper undertakes a comparative legal study to analyze the challenges of privacy and personal data protection posed by Artificial Intelligence embedded in Robots, and to offer policy suggestions. After identifying the benefits from various AI usages and the risks posed by AI-related technologies, I then analyze legal frameworks and relevant discussions in the EU, USA, Canada, and Japan, and further consider the efforts of Privacy by Design originating in Ontario, Canada. While various AI usages provide great convenience, many issues, including profiling, discriminatory decisions, lack of transparency, and impeding consent, have emerged. The unpredictability arising from the AI machine learning function poses further difficulties, which have only been partially addressed by legal frameworks in the aforementioned jurisdictions. However, analyzing the relevant discussions yielded several suggestions. The first priority is adopting PbD as the most flexible, soft-legal, and preferable approach toward AI-oriented issues. Implementing PbD will protect individual privacy and personal data without specific efforts, and achieve both the development of AI and the advancement of privacy and personal data protection. Technical measures that can adapt to an individual’s dynamic choices according to the “context” should be further developed. Furthermore, alternative technical measures, including those to solve the “algorithmic black box” or achieve differential privacy, warrant thorough examination. If AI surpasses human intelligence, a terminating function, such as a “kill switch” will be the last resort to preserve individual choice. Despite numerous difficulties, we must prepare for the coming AI-prevalent society by taking a flexible approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inaccuracy as a privacy-enhancing tool.Gloria González Fuster - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95.
Property, privacy and personhood in a world of ambient intelligence.Niels van Dijk - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):57-69.
Property, privacy and personhood in a world of ambient intelligence.Niels Dijk - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):57-69.
Privacy and Protection of Marginalized Social Groups.Stephen Kabera Karanja - 2009 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3).
Privacy by design: delivering the promises. [REVIEW]Peter Hustinx - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):253-255.
Data Science and Designing for Privacy.Michael Falgoust - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (1):51-68.
The moral value of informational privacy in cyberspace.Diane P. Michelfelder - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):129-135.
Privacy Rights and Democracy: A Contradiction in Terms?Annabelle Lever - 2006 - Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):142-162.
Privacy Rights and Democracy: A Contradiction in Terms?Annabelle Lever - 2006 - Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):142-162.
Privacy by Design.Peter Schaar - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):267-274.
Privacy by Design in Personal Health Monitoring.Anders Nordgren - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (2):148-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-16

Downloads
85 (#194,339)

6 months
23 (#116,187)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?