Immaterial: Rules in Contemporary Art

Oxford University Press (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary art can seem chaotic: it may be made of toilet paper, candies you can eat, or meat that is thrown out after each exhibition. Some works fill a room with obsessively fabricated objects, while others purport to include only concepts, thoughts, or language. Immaterial argues that, despite these unruly appearances, making rules is a key part of what many contemporary artists do when they make their works, and these rules can explain disparate developments in installation art, conceptual art, time-based media art, and participatory art. Sherri Irvin shows how rules are now an artistic medium: they are part of the work's structure and shape what it expresses. Rules are meaningful in themselves and help to activate the meanings of non-art materials and found objects, so audiences need to know about the rules to get the most out of their art experiences. Loss of information about the rules, like loss of a chunk of marble, can seriously damage the work, and preserving rules as well as objects is reshaping how museums maintain their collections. Where rules collide with real-world circumstances, they may be broken maliciously, mistakenly, or for good reasons, threatening the work's meanings and sometimes its very existence. Should we celebrate the prominence of rules in contemporary art? Irvin argues that, while rules aren't always used well, they can be used to create distinctive meanings and provide powerful immersive experiences not achievable through any other means.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Installation Art and Performance: A Shared Ontology.Sherri Irvin - 2013 - In Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art and Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press. pp. 242-262.
The Ontological Diversity of Visual Artworks.Sherri Irvin - 2008 - In Kathleen Stock & Katherine Thomson-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1-19.
Rules, Incentivization, and the Ontology of Human Society.Gabriel Guzmán & Cristian Frasser - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (6):440-462.
Duns scotus on the immaterial.Stephen Priest - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):370-372.
In Advance of the Broken Theory: Philosophy and Contemporary Art.Sherri Irvin & Julian Dodd - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):375-386.
Contemporary Polish ontology. Where it is and where it is going.Roman Krzanowski - 2020 - Philosophical Problems in Science 69:294-298.
The Ontology of the Future from a Process Philosophical Point of View.Vesselin Petrov - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 26:55-59.
A Vindication of Ontology.Andrzej Chmielecki - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 13:14-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-17

Downloads
87 (#190,661)

6 months
32 (#101,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sherri Irvin
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

How to Change an Artwork.David Friedell - 1966 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Art and philosophy. [New York]: New York University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Constitutive Rules: Games, Language, and Assertion.Indrek Reiland - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1):136-159.
Against Kania’s Fictionalism about Musical Works.Philip Letts - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (2):209-224.

Add more references