Varieties of Sobel sequences

Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (6):633-671 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I provide a unified analysis of a number of pragmatic anomalies that have been discussed in the literature. The paper’s main goal is to account for Sobel sequences of conditionals and sequences of disjunctive sentences, but I will also propose that this analysis can be extended to sequences of sentences with superlatives. The starting point is the observation that, while all these sequences are felicitous in one order, they are infelicitous when the order is reversed. Previous proposals have focussed on particular types of infelicitous sequences Ken Hale: A life in language, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001; Moss in Noûs 46:516–586, 2012; Lewis in Noûs 52:481–507, 2018; a.o.), or a subset of all the phenomena cited above Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches on implicatures and presuppositions. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke, 2017; a.o.). I propose that sequences of sentences belonging to the same structured set of alternatives T are subject to a Specificity Constraint : sequences are acceptable if both alternatives are dominated by the same number of nodes in the structured set of alternatives T. Violations of SC can be avoided by strengthening the weaker alternative. However, covert strengthening violates an economy condition if the overtly stronger alternative is among those made salient by the preceding utterance in the sequence. I propose that the set of alternatives made salient by an utterance of a sentence s consists of s’s sisters and mother in T. I will show that the strengthening mechanism varies depending on the kind of sequence we have.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lessons from Sobel sequences.Malte Willer - 2017 - Semantics and Pragmatics 10 (4):1-57.
Presuppositional Anaphora Is The Sobel Truth.Daniel Dohrn - 2017 - In Salvatore Pistoia-Reda & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches on Implicatures and Presuppositions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 199-238.
Counterfactual scorekeeping.Anthony S. Gillies - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):329 - 360.
How Strong Is a Counterfactual?David Boylan & Ginger Schultheis - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (7):373-404.
Specker sequences revisited.Jakob G. Simonsen - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):532-540.
Cofinally Invariant Sequences and Revision.Edoardo Rivello - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (3):599-622.
General random sequences and learnable sequences.C. P. Schnorr & P. Fuchs - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (3):329-340.
Relative lawlessness in intuitionistic analysis.Joan Rand Moschovakis - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):68-88.
Coherent sequences versus Radin sequences.James Cummings - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 70 (3):223-241.
Shift-complex sequences.Mushfeq Khan - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (2):199-215.
Basson's Ontological Argument.W. I. Matson - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (2):316 - 320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-25

Downloads
24 (#563,255)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ab Esse ad Posse Non Valet Consequentia.Daniel Dohrn - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (2):391-409.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.
On conditionals.Dorothy Edgington - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):235-329.
Indicative conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.

View all 35 references / Add more references