Authors
Attracta Ingram
University College Dublin
Abstract
Some of us were introduced to political philosophy as an activity of identifying, criticising, and revising the moral basis of existing social institutions. We asked questions about the nature of the good or the just society, and some few of us thought that once we knew and advocated the truth, it would win out. We, or some appropriate revolutionary or reforming group or class, would with reason, truth, and history on our side, bring about the society of our ideals. When we first read John Rawls's A Theory of Justice we read it as continuing the traditional tasks of political philosophy. Justice as Fairness was a moral theory which addressed a political subject matter. From the moral point of view it told us what any just society aiming to realise the values of liberty and equality would be like. This comported nicely with liberal cosmopolitanism, and also with more widely shared philosophical views that the task of political philosophy is to construct a vision of an ideal society, perhaps more sensitive to justice in implementation than would be required in pre-modern, pre-democratic societies, but nevertheless an ideal which in the long run we would hope to see all societies converge on. That kind of liberalism gave those of us who think that Rawlsian justice is the right or true justice a license to go on the offensive in promoting liberal ideals and practices in our own society, and, at the very least, a critical vantage point from which to judge other societies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100005920
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Constitutional Patriotism.Ingram Attracta - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):1-18.
Enlightenment Liberalism and the Challenge of Pluralism.Matthew Jones - 2012 - Dissertation, Canterbury Christ Church University

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Pragmatists Cannot Be Pluralists.Robert Talisse - 2005 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (1):101 - 118.
Motivating Cosmopolitanism? A Skeptical View.Patti Tamara Lenard - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):346-371.
Why Pragmatists Should Be Rawlsians.Robert B. Talisse - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):71-78.
The Place of Self‐Respect in a Theory of Justice.Gerald Doppelt - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):127 – 154.
Moral Advice and Moral Theory.Uri D. Leibowitz - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 146 (3):349 - 359.
Domains, Plural Truth, and Mixed Atomic Propositions.Jeremy Wyatt - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):225-236.
Simplifying Alethic Pluralism.Douglas Edwards - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (1):28-48.
Comparativists and Cosmopolitans on Cross Cultural Conversations.Ruth Abbey - 2008 - Revista de Filosofía (México) 40 (121):45-64.
Creating Cosmopolitans.Patti Tamara Lenard - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):613-630.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-23

Total views
18 ( #607,939 of 2,505,201 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,201 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes