Predicting the Underlying Factors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates in Public Universities: A Path Analysis Approach [Book Review]
Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):103-120 (2013)
Abstract
Building on the modified theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study examined the underlying psychological motives for academic dishonesty in a sample of 250 undergraduates drawn from three selected Malaysian public universities. The results yielded additional supports for usefulness of modified TPB model in predicting academic misconduct. All components of the model exerted statistically significant effects on intention towards academic misconduct, and intention itself exerted a statistically significant impact on academic dishonesty. This suggests that students’ academic misconducts could be addressed effectively if proper attention is given to the underpinning factors. Further, the findings revealed that the hypothesized relationships among variables of the modified model were all statistically significant. The uniqueness of this study lies in the large amount of variance (69 % and 75 %) explained by components of the model (in the prediction of intention and academic dishonesty respectively). These variances have rarely been accounted for in the previous studies. Implications of the findings are discussed and suggestions advanced for future studiesDOI
10.1007/s10805-013-9183-x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Academic Dishonesty, Self-Control, and General Criminality: A Prospective and Retrospective Study of Academic Dishonesty in a New Zealand University.Mei Wah M. Williams & Matthew Neil Williams - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (2):89 - 112.
The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates.Trevor S. Harding, Matthew J. Mayhew, Cynthia J. Finelli & Donald D. Carpenter - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):255 – 279.
Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behaviour. [REVIEW]Philmore Alleyne & Kimone Phillips - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (4):323-338.
Individual differences in workplace deviance and integrity as predictors of academic dishonesty.Gale M. Lucas & James Friedrich - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):15 – 35.
Volunteers Versus Non-Volunteers—Which Group Cheats More, and Holds More lax Attitudes About Cheating?Aditya Simha, Josh P. Armstrong & Joseph F. Albert - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):205-215.
Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals.Elsie C. Ameen, Daryl M. Guffey & Jeffrey J. McMillan - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):591 - 597.
Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.Donald D. Carpenter, Trevor S. Harding, Cynthia J. Finelli & Honor J. Passow - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):311-324.
Using the Scenario Method to Analyze Cheating Behaviors.Peter W. Schuhmann, Robert T. Burrus, Preston D. Barber, J. Edward Graham & M. Fara Elikai - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):17-33.
Is plagiarism a forerunner of other deviance? Imagined futures of academically dishonest students.Gwena Lovett-Hooper, Meera Komarraju, Rebecca Weston & Stephen J. Dollinger - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):323 – 336.
Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: A criterion study.Daniel E. Martin, Asha Rao & Lloyd R. Sloan - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):36 – 50.
Student academic dishonesty: What do academics think and do, and what are the barriers to action?Adele Thomas & Gideon P. De Bruin - 2012 - African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):13.
Academic and business ethical misconduct and cultural values: A cross national comparison. [REVIEW]Soheila Mirshekary & Ann D. K. Lawrence - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):141-157.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-04-05
Downloads
52 (#227,734)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
2013-04-05
Downloads
52 (#227,734)
6 months
2 (#297,033)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities.Natalia Maloshonok & Evgeniia Shmeleva - 2019 - Journal of Academic Ethics 17 (3):313-329.
Validating Academic Integrity Survey : An Application of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures.Imran Adesile, Mohamad Sahari Nordin, Yedullah Kazmi & Suhaila Hussien - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (2):149-167.
Academic Cheating in Disliked Classes.Eric M. Anderman & Sungjun Won - 2019 - Ethics and Behavior 29 (1):1-22.
Academic integrity in the Muslim world: a conceptual map of challenges of culture.Michelle Picard & Akbar Akbar - 2020 - International Journal for Educational Integrity 16 (1).
Academic Integrity in Higher Education: the Case of a Medium-Size College in the Galilee, Israel.Jonathan Kasler, Meirav Hen & Adi Sharabi-Nov - 2019 - Journal of Academic Ethics 17 (2):151-167.
References found in this work
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.Kenneth D. Butterfield, Linda Klebe Trevino & Donald L. McCabe - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):219-232.
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Martin Fishbein & Icek Ajzen - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (2):130-132.
Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations.Jennifer L. Kisamore, Thomas H. Stone & I. M. Jawahar - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):381-394.
Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. [REVIEW]Deborah Crown & M. Spiller - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):229-246.
Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.Donald D. Carpenter, Trevor S. Harding, Cynthia J. Finelli & Honor J. Passow - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):311-324.