Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy

Isis 62 (1):21-35 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/350705

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.Carolyn Iltis - 1971 - Isis 62:21-35.
The vis viva controversy.David Papineau - 1981 - In Roger Stuart Woolhouse (ed.), Leibniz, Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
Leibniz' "discourse on the natural theology of the chinese" and the Leibniz-Clarke controversy.Albert Ribas - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (1):64-86.
Leibniz vs.Sarah Carvallo - unknown
The Vis viva Controversy, a Post-Mortem.L. L. Laudan - 1968 - Isis 59 (2):130-143.
Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis viva Controversy.Thomas L. Hankins - 1965 - Isis 56 (3):281-297.
The vis viva controversy: Do meanings matter?David Papineau - 1977 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (2):111-142.
Cavendish and the Vis Viva Controversy: A Leibnizian Postscript.P. Heimann & J. Mcguire - 1971 - Isis 62:225-227.
Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis viva Controversy.Thomas Hankins - 1965 - Isis 56:281-297.
Viva Delay.Hossein Yahaghi, Shahryar Sorooshian & Javad Yahaghi - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):945-946.
Leibniz and Malebranche on innate ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Leibniz.Albert Ribas - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (1).
Declarative vs. Procedural Rules for Religious Controversy: Leibniz's Rational Approach to~ Heresy.Frédéric Nef - 2008 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Springer. pp. 383--395.
Apology for a Credo Maximum: On Three Basic Rules in Leibniz's Method of Religious Controversy.Mogens Laerke - 2008 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Springer. pp. 397--407.
The Leibniz-Stahl Controversy.François Duchesneau & Justin E. H. Smith (eds.) - 2016 - Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Descartes' physiology and its relation to his psychology.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 335--370.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references