Blair on Rodin: Rejoinder

Res Publica 14 (4):313-316 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is a brief response to Jacob Blair’s critique of David Rodin’s argument in War and Self-Defense that there are circumstances in which war conceivably could be justified not as self-defence, but as law enforcement or punishment. It argues that while Rodin’s position potentially is less dilemmatic than Blair suggests, Blair nevertheless usefully highlights tensions within it. Blair’s own argument in favour of ar as law-enforcement is suggestive, but in no way conclusive.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

War and Self-Defense.Christopher Woodard - 2005 - Mind 114 (454):453-457.
War and Self Defense.David Rodin - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
War and self-defense.David Rodin - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.
David Rodin's War and Self-Defense.David Garren - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (3):245-251.
David Rodin's War and Self-Defense.David J. Garren - 2003 - Journal of Military Ethics 2 (3):245-251.
Defending the common life: National-defence after Rodin.Deane-Peter Baker - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (3):259–275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#356,937)

6 months
11 (#352,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

War and Self Defense.David Rodin - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
War and self-defense.David Rodin - 2004 - Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.

Add more references