Caring for Nature: What Science and Economics Can't Teach Us but Religion Can

Environmental Values 15 (3):307 - 313 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Neither ecologists nor economists can teach us what we most need to know about nature: how to value it. The Hebrew prophets claimed that there can be no intelligent human ecology except as people learn to use land justly and charitably. Lands do not flow with milk and honey for all unless and until justice rolls down like waters. What kind of planet ought we humans wish to have? One we resourcefully manage for our benefits? Or one we hold in loving care? Science and economics can't teach us that; perhaps religion and ethics can



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Situational analysis beyond neoclassical economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Regarding nature: industrialism and deep ecology.Andrew McLaughlin - 1993 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Beyond economics.Kenneth Ewart Boulding - 1968 - Ann Arbor,: University of Michigan Press.
Science, economics, 'vision'.Susan Haack - 2004 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 71 (2):223-234.
Asking Students What Philosophers Teach.James Pearson - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (1):31-49.


Added to PP

48 (#333,173)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foreword.John Collins & Christopher Peacocke - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):441-452.

Add more references