The Division and Methods of the Sciences. St. Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on Questions V and VI of the De Trinitate of Boethius [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 6:215-218 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All scientific knowledge is in some way unified; the scheme of the speculative sciences is not just a method of arrangement that is casual and artificial. There is a true hierarchy of the sciences. In popular thought to-day the empirical sciences have gained the ascendancy; there are those who are confident that science will not only unlock the mysteries of nature but will solve eventually all our problems. There is no mistake about its success, for its practical benefit to mankind is immense. The modern mind is so impressed by utility that it refuses to be concerned with anything else.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Analogy and Our Knowledge of God. [REVIEW]Ignatius O’Brien - 1956 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 6:91-104.
The Division and Methods of the Sciences. St. Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on Questions V and VI of the De Trinitate of Boethius.Armand Maurer - 1953
The division and methods of the sciences: Questions V and VI of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius. Thomas - 1963 - Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Edited by Armand A. Maurer.
Boecio y la división de las ciencias especulativas en el De Trinitate.Rafael Pascual - 2001 - Alpha Omega 4 (1):67-86.
The Division and Methods of the Sciences. [REVIEW]Robert L. Cunningham - 1956 - New Scholasticism 30 (1):106-107.
Thomas Aquinas and Avicenna on the Relationship between First Philosophy and the Other Theoretical Sciences: A Note on Thomas's Commentary on Boethius's „De Trinitate", Q. 5, art. 1, ad 9. [REVIEW]John F. Wippel - 1973 - The Thomist 37 (1):133-154.
The Trinity: An Analysis of St. Thomas Aquinas' "Expositio" of the "de Trinitate" of Boethius.Douglas C. Hall - 1950 - Brill.
The friar and the vizier on the range of the theoretical sciences.R. E. Houser - unknown
St. Thomas Aquinas, Faith, reason and theology. Questions I-IV of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius. Translated with introduction and notes by Armand Maurer. [REVIEW]Fernand Van Steenberghen - 1988 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 86 (70):257-258.
Thomas Aquinas on the Distinction and Derivation of the Many from the One: A Dialectic between Being and Nonbeing.John F. Wippel - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):563 - 590.
Aquinas’s Commentary on Boethius’s De Trinitate.Ariberto Acerbi - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):317-338.
An Analysis of St. Thomas Aquinas' Expositio of the De Trinitate of Boethius.Douglas C. HALL - 1992 - E. J. Brill.
The Division and Methods of the Sciences: Questions V and VI of His Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius.Thomas Aquinas - 1986 - PIMS.
Intellectual elitism and the need for faith in Maimonides and Aquinas.F. Romero-Carrasquilo - unknown
The Division and Methods of the Sciences. [REVIEW]Joseph F. Wulftange - 1955 - Modern Schoolman 32 (3):282-286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references