Brill (2011)

Katerina Ierodiakonou
University of Geneva
Sophie Roux
École Normale Supérieure
Thought experiments being central to contemporary philosophy and science, the following questions were asked in recent literature. What is their definition? Are they heuristic devices, arguments, paradoxes? Are they comparable to real experiments? Do intuition and conceivability intervene? Equally imaginative thought experiments are found in ancient, medieval, and Renaissance texts. Paying attention to prime historical examples of thought experiments, we show that historical perspectives help answer these general questions.
Keywords Thought experiments History
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $59.25 used (60% off)   $100.00 new (33% off)   Amazon page
Call number BD265.T46 2011
ISBN(s) 9789004201767   9004201769
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Thought Experiments.Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James R. Brown - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 25 (1):135-142.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Backdoor Analycity.Gerald J. Massey - 1991 - In Tamara Horowitz (ed.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield.
Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #222,809 of 2,463,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,391 of 2,463,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes