The digital police state: Fichte’s revenge on Hegel

Philosophical Investigations 13 (28):1-19 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When the threat posed by the digitalization of our lives is debated in our media, the focus is usually on the new phase of capitalism called “surveillance capitalism”: a total digital control over our lives exerted by state agencies and private corporations. However, important as this “surveillance capitalism” is, it is not yet the true game changer; there is a much greater potential for new forms of domination in the prospect of direct brain-machine interface (“wired brain”). First, when our brain is connected to digital machines, we can cause things to happen in reality just by thinking about them; then, my brain is directly connercted to another brain, so that another individual can directly share my experience). Extrapolated to its extreme, wired brain opens up the prospect of what Ray Kurzweil called Singularity, the divine-like global space of shared awareness … Whatever the (dubious, for the time being) scientific status of this idea, it is clear that its realization will affect the basic features of humans as thinking/speaking beings: the eventual rise of Singularity will be apocalyptic in the complex meaning of the term: it will imply the encounter with a truth hidden in our ordinary human existence, i.e., the entrance into a new post-human dimension, which cannot but be experienced as catastrophic, as the end of our world. But will we still be here to experience our immersion into Singularity in any human sense of the term?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Osmotic Subject of the Digital.Mats Carlsson - 2013 - International Journal of Žižek Studies 7 (4).
The neuro-image: a Deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture.Patricia Pisters - 2012 - Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
To Think About Deliberative Democracy.Tatyana Vasileva Petkova - 2017 - Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy 1 (1):15-26.
Communication between Body and Image.Irena Aimova - 2009 - Filozofia 64 (5):465-469.
III—Ethics for Possible Futures.Tim Mulgan - 2014 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (1pt1):57-73.
Human Rights for the Digital Age.Kay Mathiesen - 2014 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 29 (1):2-18.
Critical Theory of Digital Media.Ian Angus - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (2):443-446.
Brains-in-vats, giant brains and world brains: the brain as metaphor in digital culture.Charlie Gere - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (2):351-366.
Digital Vigilantism as Weaponisation of Visibility.Daniel Trottier - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (1):55-72.
Against Brain-in-a-Vatism: On the Value of Virtual Reality.Jon Cogburn & Mark Silcox - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (4):561-579.
Ethics in the Digital Domain.Robert S. Fortner - 2020 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Understanding Digital Ethics: Cases and Contexts.Jonathan Beever, Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick - 2019 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-12

Downloads
87 (#190,661)

6 months
26 (#109,596)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Žižek's Hegelian-Lacanian Reading of the Subject.Bayan Karimi & Masoud Binandeh - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (35):248-267.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of natural right: according to the principles of the Wissenschaftslehre.Johann Gottlieb Fichte - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Frederick Neuhouser & Michael Baur.

Add more references