In defence of natural daylight

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):1-18 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Objects appear different as the illumination under which they are perceived varies. This fact is sometimes thought to pose a problem for the view that colours are mind-independent properties: if a coloured object appears different under different illuminations, then under which illumination does the object appear the colour it really is? I argue that given the nature of natural daylight, and certain plausible assumptions about the nature of the colours it illuminates, there is a non-arbitrary reason to suppose that it is under natural daylight that we are able to perceive the real colours of objects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-07

Downloads
130 (#137,470)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Allen
University of York

Citations of this work

Being coloured and looking coloured.Keith Allen - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):pp. 647-670.
Being Coloured and Looking Coloured.Keith Allen - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):647-670.
The Nature of Timbre.Vivian Mizrahi - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references