Science, Coloniality, and “the Great Rationality Divide”

Science & Education 27 (7-8):783-803 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article aims to analyze how science is discursively attached to certain parts of the world and certain “kinds of people,” i.e., how scientific knowledge is culturally connected to the West and to whiteness. In focus is how the power technology of coloniality organizes scientific content in textbooks as well as how science students are met in the classroom. The empirical data consist of Swedish science textbooks. The analysis is guided by three questions: if and how the colonial history of science is described in Swedish textbooks; how history of science is described; how the global South is represented. The analysis focuses on both what is said and what is unsaid, recurrent narratives, and cultural silences. To discuss how coloniality is organizing the idea of science eduation in terms of the science learner, previous studies are considered. The concepts of power/knowledge, epistemic violence, and coloniality are used to analyze how notions of scientific rationality and modernity are deeply entangled with a colonial way of seeing the world. The analysis shows that the colonial legacy of science and technology is not present in the textbooks. More evident is the talk about science as development. I claim that discourses on scientific development block out stories problematizing the violence done in the name of science. Furthermore, drawing on earlier classroom studies, I examine how the power of coloniality organize how students of color are met and taught, e.g., they are seen as in need of moral fostering rather than as scientific literate persons.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,125

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ‘great divide’ in music.James O. Young - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):175-184.
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
On Denying a Presupposition of Sellars' Problem:A Defense of Propositionalism.Jonathan Kvanvig - 2005 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 50 (4):173-190.
Is Science Contemporary Rationality?Marx W. Wartofsky - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:1370-1375.
Cosmopolitanism and the De-colonial Option.Walter Mignolo - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (2):111-127.


Added to PP

9 (#1,036,381)

6 months
1 (#862,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Can the Subaltern Speak?Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak - 1988 - Die Philosophin 14 (27):42-58.
The Promise of Happiness.Sara Ahmed - 2010 - Durham [NC]: Duke University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references