Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):258-261 (2009)

Abstract
Research that includes non-human animal experimentation is fundamentally a dilemmatic enterprise. Humans use other animals in research to improve life for their own species. Ethical principles are established to deal with this dilemma. But despite this ethical apparatus, people who in one way or another work with animal experimentation have to interpret and understand the principles from their individual points of view. In interviews with members of Swedish animal ethics committees, different views on what the term ethics really means were articulated. For one member, the difficult ethical dilemma of animal experimentation is the lack of enriched cages for mice. For another, the ethical problem lies in regulations restraining research. A third member talks about animals’ right not to be used for human interests. These different views on “ethics” intersect once a month in the animal ethics committee meetings. There is no consensus on what constitutes the ethical problem that the members should be discussing. Therefore, personal views on what ethics means, and hierarchies among committee members, characterise the meetings. But committee traditions and priorities of interpretation as well are important to the decisions. The author discusses how “ethics” becomes situated and what implications this may have for committees’ decisions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2008.026989
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

When Species Meet.Donna Jeanne Haraway - 2007 - Univ of Minnesota Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reforming the Politics of Animal Research.Lisa Hara Levin & William A. Reppy - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):563-566.
The Indispensability of Holistic Species Experts for Ethical Animal Research.Julia D. Gibson - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (6):1-18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Controversy Over Retrospective Moral Judgment.Allen E. Buchanan - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.
Coetzee and Alternative Animal Ethics.Elisa Aaltola - 2010 - In Peter Singer & Anton Leist (eds.), J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. Columbia University Press.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
23 ( #495,128 of 2,518,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes