On the computational complexity of the numerically definite syllogistic and related logics

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):1-28 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The numerically definite syllogistic is the fragment of English obtained by extending the language of the classical syllogism with numerical quantifiers. The numerically definite relational syllogistic is the fragment of English obtained by extending the numerically definite syllogistic with predicates involving transitive verbs. This paper investigates the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for these fragments. We show that the satisfiability problem (= finite satisfiability problem) for the numerically definite syllogistic is strongly NP-complete, and that the satisfiability problem (= finite satisfiability problem) for the numerically definite relational syllogistic is NEXPTIME-complete, but perhaps not strongly so. We discuss the related problem of probabilistic (propositional) satisfiability, and thereby demonstrate the incompleteness of some proof-systems that have been proposed for the numerically definite syllogistic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lewis Dichotomies in Many-Valued Logics.Simone Bova - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1271-1290.
Fragments of language.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):207-223.
A System of Relational Syllogistic Incorporating Full Boolean Reasoning.Nikolay Ivanov & Dimiter Vakarelov - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (4):433-459.
Complexity of the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):369-395.
The Syllogistic with Unity.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):391-407.
Branching-time logics repeatedly referring to states.Volker Weber - 2009 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (4):593-624.
On the restraining power of guards.Erich Grädel - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1719-1742.
Two variable first-order logic over ordered domains.Martin Otto - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):685-702.
Syllogistic Logic with Comparative Adjectives.Lawrence S. Moss - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (3):397-417.
The complexity of hybrid logics over equivalence relations.Martin Mundhenk & Thomas Schneider - 2009 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (4):493-514.
Logics for the relational syllogistic.Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Lawrence S. Moss - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):647-683.
A reconstruction of Aristotle's modal syllogistic.Marko Malink - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):95-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Extended Syllogistics in Calculus CL.Jens Lemanski - 2020 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (2):557-577.
The Syllogistic with Unity.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):391-407.
A System of Relational Syllogistic Incorporating Full Boolean Reasoning.Nikolay Ivanov & Dimiter Vakarelov - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (4):433-459.
Decidable first-order modal logics with counting quantifiers.Christopher Hampson - 2016 - In Lev Beklemishev, Stéphane Demri & András Máté (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 11. CSLI Publications. pp. 382-400.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the logic of "few", "many", and "most".Philip L. Peterson - 1979 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (1):155-179.
Complexity of the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):369-395.
More Fragments of Language.Ian Pratt-Hartmann & Allan Third - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):151-177.

View all 11 references / Add more references