How things might have been: Individuals, kinds, and essential properties - by Penelope Mackie [Book Review]

Philosophical Books 49 (1):67-68 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-0149.2008.456_11.x

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Essentialism and Reference to Kinds: Three issues in Penelope Mackie's How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties.Teresa Robertson - 2009 - Philosophical Books 50 (3):125-141.
Sortal concepts and essential properties.Penelope Mackie - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):311-333.
Review: How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties. [REVIEW]E. J. Lowe - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):762-766.
Essences and natural kinds.Alexander Bird - 2009 - In Robin Le Poidevin, Simons Peter, McGonigal Andrew & Ross P. Cameron (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge. pp. 497--506.
Essentialism vis-à-vis Possibilia, Modal Logic, and Necessitism.Sonia Roca-Royes - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (1):54-64.
Do relations require underlying intrinsic properties? A physical argument for a metaphysics of relations.Michael Esfeld - 2003 - Metaphysica: International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics 4 (1):5-25.
How things might have been: individuals, kinds, and essential properties.Penelope Mackie - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
420 (#44,599)

6 months
89 (#45,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hymers
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references