A defence of aesthetic experience: In reply to George Dickie

British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):62-63 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our response to representational art can be called "aesthetic" even if we are not "detached from cognitive and moral matters." for the pleasure we receive from "huckleberry finn" (dickie's example) is not based on its historical or sociological accuracy, Or on our agreement with its moral statements. We enjoy and value the novel because of its wit and irony, Which subvert and so transcend its cognitive and moral truths

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience.George Dickie - 1965 - Journal of Philosophy 62 (5):129–136.
Ethics and aesthetics: Replies to Dickie, Stecker, and Livingston.Noël Carroll - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):82-95.
Irreversible generalism: A reply to Dickie.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
Attitude and object: Aldrich on the aesthetic.George Dickie - 1966 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (1):89-91.
An earnest reply to professor Stalker.George Dickie - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):713-718.
Reply to Ryckman.George Dickie - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (2):177.
Reply to noël Carroll.George Dickie - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):311-312.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#242,723)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references