Full intuitionistic linear logic

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 64 (3):273-291 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we give a brief treatment of a theory of proofs for a system of Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic. This system is distinct from Classical Linear Logic, but unlike the standard Intuitionistic Linear Logic of Girard and Lafont includes the multiplicative disjunction par. This connective does have an entirely natural interpretation in a variety of categorical models of Intuitionistic Linear Logic. The main proof-theoretic problem arises from the observation of Schellinx that cut elimination fails outright for an intuitive formulation of Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic; the nub of the problem is the interaction between par and linear implication. We present here a term assignment system which gives an interpretation of proofs as some kind of non-deterministic function. In this way we find a system which does enjoy cut elimination. The system is a direct result of an analysis of the categorical semantics, though we make an effort to present the system as if it were purely a proof-theoretic construction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the unity of logic.Jean-Yves Girard - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 59 (3):201-217.
The logic of bunched implications.Peter W. O'Hearn & David J. Pym - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):215-244.
A note on full intuitionistic linear logic.G. M. Bierman - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 79 (3):281-287.
Linearizing intuitionistic implication.Patrick Lincoln, Andre Scedrov & Natarajan Shankar - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 60 (2):151-177.
Imperative programs as proofs via game semantics.Martin Churchill, Jim Laird & Guy McCusker - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (11):1038-1078.
Reflections on “difficult” embeddings.Andreja Prijatelj - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):71 - 84.
A normalizing system of natural deduction for intuitionistic linear logic.Sara Negri - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (8):789-810.
Normal deduction in the intuitionistic linear logic.G. Mints - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (5-6):415-425.
Lineales.Martin Hyland & Valeria de Paiva - 1991 - O Que Nos Faz Pensar:107-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
63 (#250,762)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Valeria Correa Vaz De Paiva
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Proof theory in the abstract.J. M. E. Hyland - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 114 (1-3):43-78.
A comparison between monoidal and substructural logics.Clayton Peterson - 2016 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 26 (2):126-159.
Investigations into a left-structural right-substructural sequent calculus.Lloyd Humberstone - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):141-171.
Commutative Lambek Grammars.Tikhon Pshenitsyn - 2023 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (5):887-936.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study.Richmond Thomason - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):255-256.
A game semantics for linear logic.Andreas Blass - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56 (1-3):183-220.
The correspondence between cut-elimination and normalization.J. Zucker - 1974 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (1):1-112.
Normalization as a homomorphic image of cut-elimination.Garrel Pottinger - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (3):323.

View all 9 references / Add more references