Experience and explanation: The justification of cognitive claims in theology

Zygon 23 (3):247-260 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The justification of cognitive claims in theology can be dealt with adequately only if the epistemological issues of metaphorical reference, experiential adequacy, and explanatory progress are seen as crucial problems for the more encompassing problem of rationality in theology. In order to guarantee any claim to reality depiction the theologian will have to argue for a plausible theory of reference on the basis of interpreted religious experience. In this discussion important analogies between the rationality of theological theorizing and the rationality of science are revealed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
61 (#387,571)

6 months
7 (#634,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
The Rationality of Science.W. Newton-Smith - 1981 - Boston: Routledge.
Religious Experience.Wayne Proudfoot - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (3):396-398.
Reason and commitment.Roger Trigg - 1973 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references