BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-17 (2021)

Guy Schofield
Bristol University
BackgroundDespite its ubiquity in academic research, the phrase ‘ethical challenge’ appears to lack an agreed definition. A lack of a definition risks introducing confusion or avoidable bias. Conceptual clarity is a key component of research, both theoretical and empirical. Using a rapid review methodology, we sought to review definitions of ‘ethical challenge’ and closely related terms as used in current healthcare research literature.MethodsRapid review to identify peer-reviewed reports examining ‘ethical challenge’ in any context, extracting data on definitions of ‘ethical challenge’ in use, and synonymous use of closely related terms in the general manuscript text. Data were analysed using content analysis. Four databases were searched from April 2016 to April 2021.Results393 records were screened, with 72 studies eligible and included: 53 empirical studies, 17 structured reviews and 2 review protocols. 12/72 contained an explicit definition of ‘ethical challenge, two of which were shared, resulting in 11 unique definitions. Within these 11 definitions, four approaches were identified: definition through concepts; reference to moral conflict, moral uncertainty or difficult choices; definition by participants; and challenges linked to emotional or moral distress. Each definition contained one or more of these approaches, but none contained all four. 68/72 included studies used terms closely related to synonymously refer to ‘ethical challenge’ within their manuscript text, with 32 different terms identified and between one and eight different terms mentioned per study.ConclusionsOnly 12/72 studies contained an explicit definition of ‘ethical challenge’, with significant variety in scope and complexity. This variation risks confusion and biasing data analysis and results, reducing confidence in research findings. Further work on establishing acceptable definitional content is needed to inform future bioethics research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00700-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Introduction to Ethical Theory for Healthcare Assistants.Daniel Rodger & Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2017 - British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 11 (11):556-561.
Challenge Studies of Human Volunteers: Ethical Issues.T. Hope - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):110-116.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #899,442 of 2,505,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,628 of 2,505,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes