Why We (Almost Certainly) are Not Moral Equals

The Journal of Ethics 21 (4):375-401 (2017)

Abstract

Faith in the universal moral equality of people enjoys close to unanimous consensus in present moral and political philosophy. Yet its philosophical justification remains precarious. The search for the basis of equality encounters insurmountable difficulties. Nothing short of a miracle seems required to stabilize universal equality in moral status amidst a vast space of distinctions sprawling between people. The difficulties of stabilizing equality against differentiation are not specific to any particular choice regarding the basis of equality. To show this, I will provide a general diagnosis of the difficulty together with its application to the arguably best attempt at a solution, namely to ground moral equality in a form of subjectivity. In his recent book Equality for Nonegalitarians, George Sher advances the view that “we are moral equals because we are equally centers of consciousness. …The fact that we are equals in this respect—that each is a world unto himself—…explains why each person’s interests are of equal moral importance”. Yet the worlds we are unto ourselves can no more withstand the force of differentiation than previous candidates suggested in the literature, and the reasons why run deeper than even some critics have recognized. The prospects for vindicating universal moral equality remain bleak.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-11

Downloads
82 (#144,817)

6 months
4 (#163,468)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Equality and Inequality in Confucianism.Chenyang Li - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):295-313.
The Moral Equality of Combatants.Barry Christian & Christie Lars - 2017 - In Seth Lazar & Helen Frowe (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Equality and Moral Worth in Natural Law Ethics and Beyond.Sherif Girgis - 2014 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 59 (2):143-162.
Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):2012.
Democratic Equality and Respect.Kenneth Baynes - 2008 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 55:1-25.
Transhumanism and Moral Equality.James Wilson - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (8):419–425.
Equality and the Significance of Coercion.Gabriel Wollner - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (4):363-381.
Equality and Transparency.Julien Beillard - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):51-61.
Equality and Priority.Dennis Mckerlie - 1994 - Utilitas 6 (1):25.

Author's Profile

Stan Husi
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

References found in this work

Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - Duckworth.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
What is the Point of Equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Rescuing Basic Equality.Tom Parr & Adam Slavny - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (3):837-857.
Radical Enhancement as a Moral Status de-Enhancer.Jesse Gray - 2020 - Monash Bioethics Review 1 (2):146-165.
What’s Personhood Got to Do with It?Hrishikesh Joshi - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):557-571.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations