For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon

Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1):1-26 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


As feminist scholars, we hope that our own work is exempt from structural problems such as racism, sexism, and Eurocentricism, that is, the kind of problems that are exemplified and enacted by Kant’s works. In other words, we hope that we do not re-enact, implicitly or explicitly, Kant’s problematic claims, which range from the unnaturalness of a female philosopher, “who might as well have a beard,” the stupid things that a black carpenter said “because he was black from head to foot,” the poor women “living in the greatest slavery in the Orient,” to the “sheep-like existence of the inhabitants of Tahiti.” In this piece, I argue that we cannot simply hope to avoid these problems unless we are vigilant about incorporating the full picture of Kant’s and Kantian philosophy into our feminist appropriations. I will show that one way to minimize if not altogether avoid this risk is to follow the model of a new methodology that establishes the continued relevance of all of Kant’s claims for our present. Inspired by Spivak’s A Critique of Postcolonial Reason, I will call this alternative methodology the “constructive complicity” approach.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,670

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminist history of philosophy.Charlotte Witt - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reclaiming Rand. [REVIEW]Karen Michalson - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):159 - 164.
Objects: A Study in Kantian Formal Epistemology.Giovanni Boniolo & Silvio Valentini - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (4):457-478.
Complicity.Saba Bazargan-Forward - 2017 - In Marija Jankovic & Kirk Ludwig (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Collective Intentionality. Routledge University Press.
Exploring Complicity: Concept, Cases and Critique.Michael Neu, Robin Dunford & Afxentis Afxentiou (eds.) - 2016 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Complicity: That Moral Monster, Troubling Matters.Peter A. French - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):575-589.


Added to PP

28 (#423,592)

6 months
1 (#480,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dilek Huseyinzadegan
Emory University

References found in this work

Critique of the Power of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Practical Philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1724 - Mineola, New York: Macmillan Company.
[Book review] the racial contract. [REVIEW]Charles W. Mills - 1997 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):155-160.

View all 41 references / Add more references