Drugs and Rights

Cambridge University Press (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This important book was the first serious work of philosophy to address the question: Do adults have a moral right to use drugs for recreational purposes? Many critics of the 'war on drugs' denounce law enforcement as counterproductive and ineffective. Douglas Husak argues that the 'war on drugs' violates the moral rights of adults who want to use drugs for pleasure, and that criminal laws against such use are incompatible with moral rights. This is not a polemical tract but a scrupulously argued work of philosophy that takes full account of all available data concerning drug use in the United States today. The author is careful to describe the properties a recreational drug would have to possess before the state would be justified in prohibiting it. Since criminal laws against the use of recreational drugs are justified neither by the harm users cause to themselves nor by the harm users cause to each other, Professor Husak concludes that such laws are, in almost all cases, unjustified.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

[Book review] drugs and rights. [REVIEW]Douglas N. Husak - 1995 - Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (1):63-72.
The Legalization of Drugs.Doug Husak & Peter de Marneffe - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
The drug laws don’t work.Michael Huemer - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):71-75.
Vice Laws and Self-Sovereignty.Peter de Marneffe - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):29-41.
Vice Laws and Self-Sovereignty.Peter Marneffe - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):29-41.
America's Unjust Drug War.Michael Huemer - 2004 - In Bill Masters (ed.), The New Prohibition. Accurate Press.
Review essay/taking drugs and rights seriously.Gerald F. Gaus - 1995 - Criminal Justice Ethics 14 (1):63-72.
Collective Action and Individual Choice.Jonny Anomaly - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):752-756.
Recreational drugs and paternalism.DouglasN Husak - 1989 - Law and Philosophy 8 (3):353 - 381.
Can drug patents be morally justified?Dr Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.
Can drug patents be morally justified?Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-05

Downloads
7 (#1,281,834)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Husak
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Retributive parsimony.Richard L. Lippke - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
Vice Crimes and Preventive Justice.Stuart P. Green - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):561-576.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references