Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies

, &
Psychological Review 71 (1):42-60 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0041729

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A suggested alternative formulation in the developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd.Ledyard R. Tucker - 1964 - Psychological Review 71 (6):528-530.
Detection of redundancy in multiple cue probability tasks.Brian A. Knowles, Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart & David A. Summers - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):425.
Optimal responding in multiple-cue probability learning.Cameron R. Peterson, Kenneth R. Hammond & David A. Summers - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (3):270.
Positive and negative redundancy in multiple cue probability tasks.Brian A. Knowles, Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart & David A. Summers - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):157.
Visual and motor components of an experimentally induced position preference in multiple probability learning.Stanford H. Simon - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):469.
Analyzing the components of clinical inference.Kenneth R. Hammond, Carolyn J. Hursch & Frederick J. Todd - 1964 - Psychological Review 71 (6):438-456.
You can’t always get what you want: Some considerations regarding conditional probabilities.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (3):573-603.
Cue selection for multiple-cue probability training.Donald Robbins & Douglas L. Medin - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):333.
Multiple-choice probability learning.Karen Block & James R. Erickson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):72.
Objective Probability Theory Theory.Ellery Eells - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James H. Fetzer (eds.), Synthese. Springer. pp. 3--44.
Configural effect in multiple-cue probability learning.Stephen E. Edgell & N. John Castellan - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):310.
A liberal conception of multiple realizability.Eric Funkhouser - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (3):467-494.
Is Multiple Realizability a Valid Argument against Methodological Individualism?Branko Mitrović - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (1):28-43.
Conditional response distributions in a multiple-choice probability-learning situtation.James R. Erickson & Karen K. Block - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):328.
Sequential dependencies in single-item and multiple-item probability learning.Irwin P. Levin, Corrine S. Dulberg, J. Frank Dooley & James V. Hinrichs - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
23 (#626,176)

6 months
5 (#441,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The methodology of social judgement theory.Ray W. Cooksey - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):141 – 174.
Upon reflection.Kenneth R. Hammond - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):239 – 248.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references