Douglas E. Edlin, judges and unjust laws: Common law constitutionalism and the foundations of judicial review

Ethics 120 (1) (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Common law constitutionalism - a different view.Margaret R. L. L. Kelly - manuscript
Review Essay: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by WJ Waluchow.Bradley W. Miller - 2007 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 52.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Understanding judicial discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.
Review of Douglas E. Edlin (ed.), Common Law Theory. [REVIEW]W. J. Waluchow - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (8).
Injustice in robes: Iniquity and judicial accountability.Raymond Wacks - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):128-149.
When judges lie (and when they should).Paul Butler - manuscript
Book Proposal.Phillips Hall - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-02

Downloads
25 (#595,425)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Paternalism and Personal Identity.John Kleinig - 2009 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 14 (1):93-106.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references